Tag Archives: Liberty

“Look at all this dirty ice you made.”

As a follow-up to my last post, National Geographic inspired me to look into my crystal ball and envision a more likely scene come the year 25,550 (more likely than 216 feet of sea level rise that is). Behold Lady Liberty of the 25th Millennium!


I had to restrain myself from adding an Al Goresicle into the ice wall or in the foreground “Shining” style. In any event, if Vostok is any indication, I’d say by the year 25K there’s a better chance this serendipitous little interglacial could very well have withered and New York could once again be under ice. At least we can take comfort in knowing that our best and brightest are already on the monumental task of geoengineering our way out of this (I gotta do it):

How come you do not agree with a statement that says we are no where [sic] close to knowing where energy is going or whether clouds are changing to make the planet brighter. We are not close to balancing the energy budget. The fact that we can not account for what is happening in the climate system makes any consideration of geoengineering quite hopeless as we will never be able to tell if it is successful or not! It is a travesty!

I know I have referred to it frequently but it’s my favorite Trenberth quote of all time. My guess is that Kevin Trenberth M (as in the 1000th) will be there to tell us that the ice sheet is a product of global warming as predicted by his great-to-the-thousandth grand pappy. Maybe I should have inserted a protestor holding up a sign reading “THIS IS THE FACE OF GLOBAL WARMING!” I do wonder what our resident soothsayers will be predicting then, or do you think they’ll just be playing the role of annoying chastiser at that point?

If you had just listened to the Oracles of the Venerable Climate League we would still have plenty of oil to keep our arses warm! Look at all this dirty ice you made. Are you gonna slice open that tauntaun or what?

Nah. My guess is the “Age of the Alarmist” will be scarcely referenced at that point, and even then only as a supreme example of the follies of Inquisitorial pseudoscience. Here’s another prediction that I’m really hoping you can bank on: this will all be a bad memory by 2030. And incidentally we’ll owe it all to Liberty.

We are currently on this precipice of greatness yet so many forces connive to keep humanity from elevating as a mass to a place where much of our present suffering becomes just a bad memory as well. We can and will work it out and we’ll have Liberty to thank. I can feel it, a national Howard Beale moment on the horizon that will go global. It is beyond time we flex our might and shake off these bothersome fleas that aim to dictate our every move, from where we can live to what we can eat to what personal level of “climate debt” is owed by each of us and on and on.

From showerhead to headset to whatever other headache they want to throw in our way, they want every part of you, cataloged and controlled. But they screwed up. They overreached, tremendously so, and the incursion upon our inalienable rights does literally threaten our opportunity to achieve Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. They so soon forget the Shot Heard Round the World and that’s a big mistake. See, more and more of us are mad as hell and we’re loaded for bear. This Second American Revolution, this Slap Heard Round the World is soon to reverberate from sea to shining sea.

Sorry. All this talk of Liberty gets the brain boiling. I do in my heart believe America will lead the way again. I preach it often I know, but Liberty is our foundation, it’s what makes America such a special place. It is in our blood and we will not shy away from fighting to maintain its course. It will be a long, hard slog, but we’re here to take our power back. Shoo! Usurpers be gone. We adults who haven’t bought real estate in Newtopia have important grown-up work to do so be on your way now. That’s right. Keep going. Keep going. Shut and bar the door. Buy-bye.

I raise my glass to Liberty in all her forms. Cheers!

“I have not yet begun to fight.”


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

My letter to National Geographic regarding Liberty – no “leap of faith” needed

Well, I guess it took me longer than I thought it would to swing back round here. Life intercedes, but that’s a good thing (to a degree). Regardless, I’m back for the moment at least. Back on August 20th Anthony Watts posted an article regarding National Geographic’s Junk Science where he determined it could take 23.5K-plus years to sink the Statue of Liberty waist-deep under RISING SEAS!!! commented on the article and also offered my letter to NG Editor Chris Johns. Jeff Alberts suggested offering it as a separate post (and a correction to a typo – thanks!) so here it is.


[As I mentioned in my initial post, I know they would never publish it in part or in full (the lead paragraph offers a nice synopsis though), but I feel better for having sent it. Needed to get some of that off my chest…again.]


The irony is fathoms deep in your ‘alarming’ ”Rising Seas” cover depicting the Statue of Liberty half-submerged in the Atlantic, a fantasy piece of such low probability that even the most climate-anxious scientists agree such an outcome would be several millennia away. The only true threat to Liberty is immediate and comes in the form of the relentless surge offered by overzealous propagandists who enthrone the political dictates of activist post-modern pseudoscience to implement an open agenda that aims to control and punish humanity.

Under the guise of the innocuous-sounding Sustainable Development banner, this edict to de-develop developed nations and cripple the growth of developing nations will do nothing to affect climate but much to promote poverty, wealth destruction, loss of national sovereignty, energy and resource rationing, restriction of property rights, further environmental degradation, and a general continued withering of Liberty.

Perhaps National Geographic could turn its attention upon that global phenomenon instead of wasting any more of its valuable pages advocating a misguided political and economic philosophy anchored in anti-science, anti-human sentiment, and above all else, abject failure. It is far beyond time that your once-proud society returned to its roots in the scientific method. What passes now for climate ‘science,’ and specifically those issues concerning attribution, is nothing more than a falsely heralded consensus of unfalsifiable ignorance. Even more objectionable is the wanton promotion of this manufactured consensus as robust and unequivocal. It is a farce and a dishonor to those who established the long-standing scientific principles that, like our Liberty, wither as a result. Richard Feynman is rolling in his grave.

One must look no farther than page 127 of the “Rising Seas” issue to understand at least a small portion of what is at play here in the article by Hannah Bloch titled “Failure Is an Option.” She says:

Scientific researchers are reluctant to own up publicly to flops. Reputations and future funding depend on perceptions of success.

Indeed, but the stakes in this case are so much higher than the simple protection of a funding stream, by several orders of magnitude in fact. What is at stake is no less than Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. That is no exaggeration when one objectively considers the reality that would be delivered through Sustainable Development.

Before continuing down that road, I did want to also touch upon the Editor’s Note, Sea Change, by Chris Johns. I surmise he was speaking tongue-in-cheek when he said “A catastrophe is playing out in slow motion.” Certainly true Mr. Johns, though not quite as slowly as I’d like. And there is in fact a man-made catastrophe unfolding, we agree, just not the same catastrophe. Yours is a crystal-ball catastrophe comprised of many a could, maybe or might. Mine is a crystal clear catastrophe-in-the-making equating to economic suicide. As [if on] cue you added this:

Because there are no computer models or scientists to tell us with certainty how fast and how much the seas will rise, it is a challenge to illustrate this story and telegraph the problem’s urgency. You could say it requires a leap of faith in imagination that is grounded in fact.

Can I translate?

I confess that the entropic nature of climate requires the concession of great uncertainty, or as Kevin Trenberth put it privately, “We are not close to balancing the energy budget,” but this will not keep us from using scare-mongering imagery and uncorrelated circumstances to foster anxiety regarding the rise in sea level that has been occurring for millennia and will continue to occur until nature flips the switch back to the next age of glaciation. Despite our knowledge that mitigation will be far costlier than adaptation in regards to efficacy, environment, and economy, we are forging ahead with the mitigation agenda regardless. To keep this agenda on course we must continue to “offer up scary scenarios” and ignore the empirical evidence that points more and more strongly toward natural variability with each passing year. We choose to instead substitute empirical evidence with model-based projection that hinges upon a leap of faith in imagination rather than a foundation in sound science.

I know it is an editorial page with a statement by a photojournalist, but regurgitating unscientific phrases such as “ever more destructive storms” and a “leap of faith in imagination” is an insult to your readership. I am willing to bet that your audience is a far more skeptical bunch than you are willing to concede. Matters as contentious as anthropogenic global warming are best presented from a balanced rather than biased viewpoint, and the attempted stifling of dissent that has been the cornerstone of AGW proponents is a wholly unscientific endeavor that must be abandoned. National Geographic could lead the way were it to choose to do so, and, were it to do so, would assist in restoring faith in modern science tarnished by the stain of activist climate science.

Finally, to lend weight to my previous statements of fact, not conspiracy, regarding the impact of Sustainable Development, I offer figures derived by the UN, its chief promoter. If we continue upon this deviant course instead of the natural course we were following (the UN termed it the Golden Economic Age), by the year 2100 the global GDP will have contracted by $200 trillion ($350 trillion vs. $550 trillion). That equates to a 40% decrease in per capita income for developed countries and a 50% decrease in per capita income for developing countries. Read that again. Eighty percent of humanity lives in developing countries and this agenda aims to cut their projected wealth in half. Please keep that in mind whenever you hear it parroted that these efforts are primarily meant to help the poor. They do the exact opposite and instead will ensure that poverty is unforgivably sustained for the world’s poorest. I conclude with my earlier premise that those propagating this agenda wish only to control and punish humanity. When enough people awaken to that reality, this backward opposition to humanity’s natural course of development, this Golden Economic Age, will be swept aside. My advice to you is to join us to that end, or step aside.

Galileonardo Marshall Warren (an homage to the physicians of H. Pylori fame)

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized


Well, RIO+20 wrapped up this past Friday and what better time to get this blog going. I had signed up back in March when I finally realized I had been banned from commenting on Media Matters for America but I’ll save that bizarre story for another day.

Back to the business at hand. I had read the RIO+20 Final Pre-Conference Draft and, having studied the Sustainable Development “movement” for a while now, I was inspired by CFACT’s turn of phrase to redesign the draft’s spiffy cover. It seems they left their logo in an unfinished state so I was happy to finish it off for them. I even offered up a new U.N. logo I hope they enjoy. I do believe my depiction is a more accurate reflection of what these folks have in store for us despite all of the new flowery language in the report concerning “poverty eradication” with visions of sugar plums and mandated green economies.

I am preparing a PDF that elaborates on the message of my cover piece (largely a dolled-up retread of my piece on The Air Vent since not much has changed other than their current “no really, we’re trying to help you” misguided PR campaign), but that could be a while. So for now, I just wanted to share the new-and-improved cover since it seemed timely. Enjoy.

H/T to WUWT and CFACT for keeping the torch lit, though pitchforks may be in order as well at some point. Speaking of which, Mr. Watts, Rothbard, Rucker, please feel free to use the revised RIO+20 image I made at will (including making it your own by cloning out my address at the bottom). The more people hear our messages of opposition to the Sustainable Misery agenda, the better. And the clearer we make that message, hopefully, the wider it will resonate. Cheers!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized